Many Americans argued that it was not right to cut some benefits of military or not. There are some Americans who are against this decision and some are with this decision. One should understand the whole scenario before making any view about this proposal.
The sustainable task force was formed by white house in order to deal with reducing the federal depict. An 18 member panel was made from this purpose to prepare this report and send it to white house. There are many questions which were born after this report. Was it right to cut off military budget and use it for other purposes?
Some people started criticizing white house for this. As a responsible citizen of America it is very important to understand the politics behind this cutting of military budget. For this purpose one should study the details of this report. Before making any argument one should compare advantages and disadvantages of this step taken by white house.
Facts and Figures
If we clearly read the details and facts of this report we will come to know the real meaning of this report. In 2009 sustainable task force panel proposed a 1.1 trillion reduction in defense expenses spending over 10 years. This decision was made by this panel after long discussion to cut off this large money for welfare of the state. These people were of the view that in the times of economic crisis no budget is above the budget required for survival of state.
Military Welfare Programs Effected
There were many military welfare programs selected by the panel for cut off purpose. These military welfare programs include military pay rises programs, retirement pays, health care benefits of the military. These programs were made to give more facilities to military officers and that is the reason why many people questioned this military budget cut off report.
Downsizing Forces
It was also proposed by the panel to reduce the size of forces. By reducing military size the state has spend less money on defense forces.
Military Bonuses Replaces
There are two different financial benefits given to military officers. These benefits includes Military pay rises pay and military bonuses. This panel suggested that these bonuses should replace these pay rises. This is how they can save a huge amount of states wealth. Due to this reason many military officers also started questioning white house about this report.
An Attack on military Benefits
This defense budget proposed by this panel directly attacks military benefits. This is the reason why the there is a debate started on this budget. Many people were of the view that it is a direct attack on the benefits given to military officers. The critics were of the view that a military officer protects and safeguards nation therefore it is not a wise decision to cut off his benefits. Therefore one must consider all the points mentioned above before making any view point about this defense report.
